Category Monetary policy
David Laidler goes meta on “What would Milton have said?”
I tried to persuade David Laidler to join us in the econoblogosphere, especially given recent arguments about Milton Friedman. I have not yet succeeded, but David did say I could use these two paragraphs from his email: "However – re. the "what Milton would have said" debate – When I was just getting started in […]
Bob Murphy, George Orwell, me, and the meaning of inflation
I think (not 100% sure) that Bob Murphy accuses me (and Scott Sumner) of doing something sort of Orwellian. Dunno, but I don't think I am. (And BTW, I don't think Austrians are necessarily doing anything Orwellian with their way(s) of using the word "inflation", though maybe some of them are being a bit overly […]
Paul Krugman, Ricardian Equivalence, and the Pigou effect
If I produce a car, and sell it, and undertake no obligation to service that car (by changing the oil), and undertake no obligation to buy back that car, and if nobody can sue me if that car goes wrong, then that car I have produced and sold is not one of my liabilities. That's […]
The strong monetarist dark force of eventual macroeconomic self-equilibration
There must be some macroeconomic equilibrating force out there we don't know about. A dark force. It's sometimes slow to work, but it does work eventually. And whatever it is, it must make monetarism truer than it theoretically would otherwise be. A monetarist force. And whatever it is, it must be much stronger than a […]
“Is the macroeconomy self-equilibrating?” is a stupid question
"At the macroeconomic level, is the market economy self-equilibrating?" I used to think that was the most important and fundamental question in macroeconomics. Now I think it's a stupid question that doesn't make sense. So when I read Paul Krugman saying: "Think of it this way: Friedman was an avid free-market advocate, who insisted that […]
Redefining “inflation”: Austrians, NGDP targets, and my mother
Some Austrians (I can't remember which ones) define "inflation" as "a growing supply of base money". [Update: Jonathan Finegold gently corrects me.] This used to strike me, as it strikes most economists, as a bit daft. OK, I would think, you can define "inflation" that way if you want, but "rising prices" is what the […]
The trade cycle: debt is trade
GDP is high in booms and low in recessions (relative to trend). That is (roughly) how we currently define "booms" and "recessions". GDP (roughly) measures the volume of trade in newly-produced final goods. But that is a narrow measure of trade. A lot of goods get traded that are not newly-produced. People buy and sell […]
The inflationistas are our friends; and inside and outside inflationistas
Noah Smith is doing something very wrong. The whole point of monetary policy at the ZLB is to create inflationistas. We need more inflationistas, not less, and so Noah should stop dumping on them, and saying their fears of inflation are groundless. For every inflationista destroyed by us laughing at their fears, central banks have […]
Money, bonds, and the price level
I want to try to answer Simon Wren-Lewis' good question. Let me first restate his question in my own words. (Always a good way to begin, to see if I've understood him properly.) Take a very simply model of an economy, in which a government issues a nominal stock of (high-powered) money M, and a […]
Money and the greater fool
[Update: this post wasn't as clear as I wanted it to be. Because my head wasn't as clear as I wanted it to be. Reading and responding to comments has helped me get clearer, I think. Let me try this: There are two reasons why people buy an asset: 1. Because owning the asset earns […]
Recent Comments