Category Nick Rowe

Liquidity-Velocity Multipliers, Menger, Money, and Financial Crises.

This is a Sunday morning [evening – I hesitated] post, about some ideas I'm playing around with, trying to get my head straight. I'm just throwing it out there, and wondering if it has enough empirical "oomph" to fly. I don't think there's anything original here. "It's all in Menger". But Menger didn't draw a […]

Trashing balance sheets and observational equivalence of fundamental and bubble money

Four years ago (and again two years ago) I argued it might be good policy for central banks to (conditionally) trash their own balance sheets. Now this idea is in the news. See Ralph Musgrave for links. The recent blogosphere debate over whether money is or is not a bubble must have sounded like angels […]

Liquidity, bubbles/ponzis/chain letters, and money

I might as well join in the fun. Along with Steve Williamson, Noah Smith, Karl Smith, Paul Krugman, David Glasner, and Steve again. [Update: and Brad DeLong and JP Koning. And David Andolfatto.] Some assets are more liquid than others (they have lower transactions costs of buying and selling). More liquid assets will have a […]

You can’t estimate Optimal Currency Areas that way

The better the Bank of Canada is doing its job, the more it will appear that the Bank of Canada should be broken in two. The worse the ECB does its job, the more it will appear that the Eurozone is an Optimal Currency Area. If central banks were even slightly more competent than random […]

Six (maybe) good arguments for deficits (and one bad).

Are deficits good or bad? That depends. Sometimes they are good, and sometimes they are bad. But even when deficits are good, don't use bad arguments to defend them. It really annoys me. First as an economist, because it's bad economics. Second, as a (Canadian, but whatever) citizen. Because we want governments to run deficits […]

Fiscal policy in a simple New Keynesian OLG model with unemployment

For wonks. And for Andy Harless, who encouraged me to do something like this. Yep, there's still a burden on future generations, even with unemployment [update: if future taxes are increased as a result of current fiscal deficits]. Assume people live 2 periods. Lifetime utility is: U = Log(consumption when young) + [(1/(1+n)]Log(consumption when old). […]

Why Noah Smith doesn’t get my point about the debt burden

Because aggregating across people alive at a particular time is not the same as aggregating across time periods in the lifetimes of a particular cohort of people. (See JP Koning on the Borges Problem  or Scott Sumner). [Update: or does Noah get my point? because later on in the comments to his post he says: […]

How time travel is possible

Suppose you wanted to take milk away from people on the east coast, and give it to people on the west coast. But you don't have any way of transporting the milk quickly enough to stop it spoiling before it gets from one coast to the other. Here's how you do it: You take milk […]

The burden of the (bad monetary policy) on future generations

You can try to kill zombie ideas. Or you can try to reframe them. I'm fed up with killing the "The national debt is not a burden on future generations because they will inherit (sic) the bonds as well as the debt so they will owe it to themselves" zombie. I already killed it a […]

Is “Y=C+I” a PPF?

I'm thinking about the best way to teach the investment demand curve in the "classical" (flexible price and wage) macroeconomic model. I don't like the way it's normally done. This post is an experiment, where I'm trying to come up with a better way. I'm not sure if I have succeeded yet, so if you […]